Play Fantasy The Most Award Winning Fantasy game with real time scoring, top expert analysis, custom settings, and more. Play Now
 
Tag:Duke
Posted on: August 5, 2009 11:50 pm
 

Parrish is right for the wrong reasons

Gary Parrish has recently done a running concept article where we vote on head to head matchups between prominent arenas.  He took the voting results for the nine winners and gave his list of the best of those nine.  Number one on his list was Cameron Indoor Stadium.  When choosing them number one he compared the stadium to the Beatles' Sgt. Pepper album.

When Gary said that Cameron Indoor Stadium was the Sgt. Pepper of basketball arenas he was right on the money.  But not for the reason he thought.

Pepper and Cameron are perfect parallels.  Both were groundbreaking.  Both were critically acclaimed.  Both were hyped well beyond their measurable worth. 

Every Beatle has been quoted on this subject a thousand times.  None of them consider Pepper their greatest album.  Most well recieved? Sure.  Most critically acclaimed?  Definitely.  A defining period statement? Absolutely.

But if you look at the songs for their individual quality and disregard the concept and artwork Pepper isn't even in the top three.

Revolver, The White Album, and Abbey Road were all vastly superior musically to Pepper.  The songs have a higher quality and were more of a product of four people working together than Pepper, which was dominated by Paul.

It is hip to claim Cameron as the best.  But does it have the history of Rupp?  Or the winning tradition of the Dean Dome?  NO!  But Cameron gets quality points for atmosphere, just as Pepper benefitted from reflecting the atmosphere of it's time in history.

My opinion is that Cameron is a basketball mecca.  But like Sgt. Pepper, when we reflect back twenty years from now we will easily be able to see better options that didn't get their proper respect due to the bias of the times.
Category: NCAAB
Posted on: July 11, 2009 1:22 am
 

An NCAA Rule Change That I Could Support

As I sit here staring at my crystal ball it has occurred to me that my crystal ball does show me the future, but it never tells me exactly what I want to know.

 

My crystal ball works in a similar way to the palantiri of “Lord of the Rings” fame.  It shows me events but leaves them open to misinterpretation.  So although I have seen glimpses of crucial March Madness match ups I can’t honestly say that I know exactly how they will play out.

 

But my device did leave me with one bit of information that I am sure I have not misinterpreted.

 

Throughout my search into the 2010 NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament the image of Coach K has dominated my visions.  His image occurs over and over from the first game all the way through the final whistle in April.

 

This can only mean one thing!

 

No, this doesn’t mean that Duke will make a run to the finals this year.

 

It means that Coach K will be the star of a new commercial this spring.  This commercial will be played fifteen times per game minimally throughout the duration of the tournament.

 

This information does not in any way help my odds in Vegas, but it did lead me to ponder an NCAA rule change that would be fair to everyone and severely improve the approval ratings of every basketball viewer.

 

It is a simple rule that could apply to every sport in college athletics. 

 

The NCAA should immediately consider a rule change that states that commercials that apply to or promote any school in the NCAA should only be allowed to run as long as that program is still in contention for the current title that the commercial in question is promoting.

 

To put it in layman’s terms this would mean that if your school loses in the first round your commercial can’t be aired after the first round.  If your school makes it to the finals then your commercial would also make it to the finals.

 

Being forced to endure Coach K promoted credit card, car, insurance, and video game commercials every year in recent memory for weeks after Duke is eliminated has led to a public outcry.  Many have stated that these commercials are an unfair recruiting tool to promote Duke at a time when recruiting is off limits.

 

Personally I don’t agree with this theory.  If a player is swayed to attend a university by watching a commercial I’m not sure that I want that particular player on my team.  A player who is that dumb wouldn’t even be smart enough to graduate with a sociology degree (this is not to disparage sociology majors, this is an inside joke.  Some of you will understand, but if you don’t please don’t be offended).

 

I don’t think any commercial gives any school any special advantage.  I am an advocate of this rule change for a very selfish reason.  THESE COMMERCIALS DRIVE ME INSANE!!!

 

Now before I get a slew of responses labeling me as a Duke hater let me say this.  Coach K is just the best example I could think of.  Old Roy has been in a few doozies that have made my skin crawl also, and I am a huge UNC fan.  If I never saw another Coke or Rock Star video game commercial with “Old Roy” as long as I live I would be a better, and happier, man.

 

The reason this rule should exist is pure common sense.  After a team is eliminated from competition the number of viewers who support that team who continue to watch the tournament dwindles significantly.  For example, the number of Gonzaga supporters who watched the finals was much smaller than the number of Gonzaga fans who watched them play their final tournament game.

 

Companies target certain demographics when they put together an idea for a commercial.  If a channel does not have the target audience that a company desires it makes little sense to advertise on that channel.

 

If you follow this logic than forcing MSU and UNC fans to watch a commercial featuring a hated rival’s coach makes little sense from any perspective.

 

I use my crystal ball in an attempt to do good, and save humanity from unneeded strife.  But I am only one average citizen.

 

I need your help.

 

Together we can save the sports world from self aggrandizing, patronizing, and self promoting commercials by famous sports figures.  Use this article like a chain letter.  Tell all your friends about this worthy cause.

 

There is still time to get this rule change put into effect before a new generation of college basketball fans are forced to Tivo every tournament game in order to escape the horror of watching a famous coach drill a mind numbing commercial into their head through sheer force of repetition.

Category: NCAAB
Tags: Duke
 
 
 
 
 
The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com